The Proof of the Pudding...

The great thing about having learnt so much in the last couple of centuries is that; we're now intelligent enough to be able to discuss how clever we are. Be impressed with ourselves and how much we've learnt and understand. Sit and wonder, what else might we learn and, would it make any difference (s) to what we already know.

That's modern and contemporary thinking. It's scientific. Fact.

Science tells us, there are no such things as God (s).

Instead it provides us with scientific Theories.

Rather than a Superhuman Being of infinite wisdom beyond any scale we ourselves (who are so clever) could imagine to begin to comprehend the Measure, .... we're offered FACT:

There was (probably) a 'Big Bang' - What? If you didn't already believe this and a five year old said, "So, in the Beginning of everything, there was this Big Bang" - would you immediately imagine ...' This Kid is a Genius!" - seriously.... would you?

So, where's the evidence to prove this.... scientifically?

Oh, take a look around - where? The Universe - This?

Science explains what it knows about itself (for every 'Science' = imagine every top mathematician, leading something or other in 'their field' and as a summary (potentially tongue in cheek) amalgamated response- "Well it's really Really BIG, in fact... it's Massive and before the Big Bang, it was nothing.

Oh....     er ... so why would Nothing suddenly have a Big Bang then?

Science: Well ... We don't  Know.

So, anyway.... Science is very clever, so I'm told often, mostly by scientists and anyone who believes all they say.

Science doesn't believe in God.

God, No?

No, God, no

Oh Good

Good?

Good, I mean, God

God is Good?

Is God Good?

Gawd a Good God

No, no Good God

Bad God?

Why's a Bad God Good?

Is 'Good' really all that Good or is it better to be Bad?

Bad is better than Good?

What?