I'd like to discuss academic associations from a paralinguistic angle and redefine what's classical and contemporary high brow reading, and the immediacy of connections relevant in declining any active support to choices made by a genius.
For example:
My Son.......
Mentioned at an academic interview..... recently, that he would include a story about a dog called Rumo, who's a hero character. I loved the idea so much, I've called my labrador 'Rumo' in his Honour.
Apparently, this is a charming introduction, for all ages, into classical philosophy and written beautifully.
They should listen more carefully and not assume everyone is relying on what they've been told to say, some speak directly about what they love.
Some people can't help being honest about what they love about life, in all it's facets, should anyone be made to feel guilty for that?
Anyway, their choice ... I guess.
