<amazed laugh>
".....Can you IMAGINE?!!!! I met a Geni, who told me I could have any wish, but that there were conditions (there's always a catch)"
"I've been thinking about how to make the most of that wish.....you know.... deliberating...... <checks>
Wishes are important, like the old saying goes, we should each be careful when it comes to those."
"Anyway, I've been spending a lot of time trying to pick a critical mass out of each and every aspect of the full concept.... <modest half laugh> Guess what?
"Can't find a fault with the story line.".... "Y'see, <leaning forward (sets scene) really enjoying getting into the swing of this/confidentially> usually there's several, you can always spot them, if you know the question behind them being there, but ... well.... basically, - I'm that analytical (and hate time wasting)so much so that I've developed a shortcut reminder system that prompts instinctive recognition. The downside is that I might look surprised ... initially, but that is often a good thing."
"I mean....., imagine you're a genius....Imagine with me, you wouldn't want to be wrong about that because.... that's a really great (and useful) thing to be. Think potential.......
However, you'd at least need to prove it to yourself. Now the best way to be satisfied with the conclusion is if it is exactly what you don't want (must be true?) or, you achieve the standard you're anticipating, in which case... the difficulty must be increased... by raising standards you're eliminating unreliable results, monitoring skill, depth, range and development. If the object is to be right then the tests must by design have independent and recognised pre set criterion, which can then be applied with biased negativity towards the results. By default, a Genius must attain credibility, by demonstrating success by utilising these very obstacles - like water to wine - 'Hey Presto!' from Negative/into Positive.
This is primary maths and formal logic......
