Are (exponentially) infinite,
An example,
Pick a subject.... any subject.... now multiply it.... and that's probably the number of paths being leisurely advanced via internal interrogation (whilst covertly and critically assessing information peripherally) and at the same time attempting to make points, to define, in referencing for memory (for further examination, or activity, obviously).
So when someone else commands their attention they may say, "What?" with a look of perplex... Or it just maybe because, they're vexed in regards to the computational addition (as well as the odds) And, they've now got to track back to the beginning of each original line of cerebrally inclined exploratory inquiry.
Though of course, appearing daft should (but it doesn't) get easier with practice. Whilst within the confines of British 'working' classes it provides solace in comically implied advantage, and yet there's still sadness underpinned by traits inherent within participating necessity - specific to integration.
Encountering any other person who offers (by some condition) the potential to exchange the exploratory gains in mutual appreciative understanding is excellent. However unlikely experience suggests the result, I've remained optimistic, albeit dismayed - by what's conveyed via preclusive allusion. Especially when combined with what's underlined by recognised 'startle mode' adoption when relieved of this fallacy by subtle intractable contradiction.
